As everybody knows, when searching for something on the internet, the first thing you encounter is usually a link to a Wikipedia page. Nowadays, Wikipedia (at least in the larger languages) is often a great starting point for learning more about something, though, as with everything else, articles should not be read uncritically.
Throughout my years investigating and writing about traditionalist/independent Catholicism and alternative popes, I have seen the relevant pages develop considerably. Only a few years ago, the English article on the Palmarian Church was sketchy, sensationalist, and filled with errors. I remember trying to change the assertion that the Palmarians had canonized Hitler, but to no avail. For some reason, somebody always reverted my edits, and in the end I gave up. Today (2026), it is entirely different. The article on the Palmarian Church is reliable and mainly based on primary sources, serious journalism, and recent scholarship, including my own texts.
Continue reading “Wikipedia and Alternative Popes”








